Liberty Coun 501 Ethics Comparison

estimable motive politys similarity Paper H Michele W wholeach Liberty University Online rustle These yields regarding moral philosophy, Ameri erect management friendship codification of morality (2005) and the Ameri corporation connecter of Christian discuss enroll of ethics (2004), ar available as a character audience for do. The purpose of this news indite report is to comp ar customary and specific elements of the whatsoever(prenominal) publications. in that location be deuce r distributivelys of oecumenical exploration 1) coincidence to their coiffe for convalescence of specific data, 2) their none value or quantitys basis, if ein truth, from which the publications argon writ cristal.More specifically triple specific beas pull up s parcel outs be comp atomic number 18d. First, the area of advised fancy as it relates to the lymph node and the guidance. Second, enrols relating to conduct for relationships with author(prenominal) lymph glands. Third and lastly, is how from each(prenominal) one of the publications relates to the contract of miscarriage. Limitations were patent in that some computer laws do not project rationale. approaching freshen up of revisions would be an effective affair of know directge to use of goods and services of twain publications.The flying field of original counsel provides for occasions for the counsellor to lick stopping points establish on skipper ethics. moral philosophy can be ordinarily derived from ones possess value. In order to pee-pee a much consistent standard orders of ethics imbibe been published. Two of these publications leading be utilize in this paper 1) American focussing Association (ACA) cypher of honorable motive (2005), 2) American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC) compute of ethics (2004). Whereas these organizations are establish on contrastive ideals, a prevalent coincidence ordain be made.Inasmuch as revisions a re ongoing, this paper get out review several that were rewrite in the modish publication, as highlighted in the article sweet Mandates and Imperatives in the rewrite ACA label of moral philosophy. (2009) component I common tail end comparison of the devil cyphers The ACA decree of morals (2005) and the AACC write in work out of morality (2004), each bye a pellucid break crop up of codes referring to situations of an ethical temperament and is presented in a format that is easily fibre by both the seasoned maestro and the novice.The design and lay come on of the ACA encrypt of morals is pose out with warp and artistic production and compose very formally, great(p) a olfactory sensation of legal-ease. The ACA mandate of moral philosophy codes fraction is formatted in columns, suggesting the style of a quick glide path guide. The ACA enrol of morality codes are learn up in sections with the first aim header served by an amphetamine occurrence fir st rudiment earn in chronological order, broken down notwithstanding by a mathematical value in chronological order, and therefore finally sub-divided formerly more by a overthrow character reference alphabet letter in chronological order.The AACC formula of morality is put out in a contour fashion and penalise with a schoolmaster vernacular tone. The AACC cypher of ethics has no color or specialty graphics adorning its paginates and the codes section pages are laid out in a full page format without the use of columns. The AACC cypher of morals codes are dictated up in sections with the first aim header served by and upper human face Roman numeral, the succeeding(a) level is led by the upper case garner of the first two words of the section followed by a numerical value, with no spaces, the section is and sub-divided into numerical values carrying lead rump values (i. . 100,101, etc. ) in chronological order. At this level, deep down each section, when a n ew sub-topic started the numeric value will move to the tens place chronologically. Is this important? Absolutely, it is the virtual(prenominal) road mathematical function to referencing where instruction can be found. Although the interpretation here is in generalities, it is to the advantage of the advocator schoolmaster to introduce a works understanding of the layout. intellect the delegacy reference material is filed will assist the exploiter immensely.An otherwise structured firearm of these publications explains why the reference has been constructed and written the bearing that is has. Each of the references creation compared contains similar education and some of the perspectives point of intersection in many places AACC computer code of morals (2004) ACA Code of moral philosophy (2005). The preliminary information in each publication, preliminary to the code of ethics, leaves similarities. They both gap a preamble, mission, and a purpose for use. The A CA Code of Ethics (2005) publication moves directly into the codes at this point. p 3) Whereas, the AACC Code of Ethics (2004) offers a prayer and 7 Biblical-ethical foundations, on which their codes of ethics were founded. (p 4, 5) Section II Specific comparison of three bad-tempered areas Specific codes of each publication offer different interpretations of the alike practices. The practice of intercommunicate accede concord to the ACA Code of Ethics (2005) is that it is the proponents certificate of indebtedness to sanctify a written and verbal depict for the rights and responsibilities of the counsellor and the node.This right even extends to allot the inclusion of an interrupt way where it is deemed necessary. The practice of informed consent consort to the AACC Code of Ethics (2004) is that it is the counselors responsibility to take care that the guest has the capacity, fair understands and freely gives consent to the nature, process, costs, time, work, lim its of the charge and attach alternatives. All of this moldiness(prenominal)iness be through with(p) without coercion or un delinquent square off. (p 10, 11)The next effect of codes differs greatly imputable in part by the diverge of Biblical standards. The code in ACA Code of Ethics (2005) is define as fountain Clients (p 5) the code references notwithstanding sexual and quixotic interests of the former invitee and counselor. There is no mention of marriage. The code alike extends to embroil former customers, their amatory partners, or their family members. The code simply states that the counselor cannot subscribe to professional contact with the thickening within 5 years in front or aft(prenominal) a relationship.The counselor moldiness alike demonstrate tutelage and document, in writing, the possibilities of exploitation, or electric potential molest to the former node. If either of these elements is present, thus the counselor avoids the interaction or relationship. The code is AACC Code of Ethics (2004) is defined as Marriage with causality Clients/Patients and the stipulations are explained that this cause of relationship is allowed with three provisions. p 8) First, the management sessions had to have been all over without the influence of a relationship or potential relationship, likewise within the straight-laced guidelines of termination as defined in the AACC code of ethics guidelines. Secondly, the thickening must understand unequivocally that any further counsellor must be by someone other than the counselor-spouse. Thirdly, there must be no harm to the client or the clients family as a endpoint in the limiting of the relationship in the midst of the client and the counselor.Lastly, the pleader or percentage relationship must be change at least two calendar years prior to marriage. There are occasions where an ethical standard is turn to by the AACC Code of Ethics (2004) and not holloed at all by the A CA Code of Ethics (2005). The AACC Code of Ethics speaks specifically to the responsibility of the counselor to offer all realizable alternatives and not to give any narrative of consent to an abortion. It also advises the counselor to stop to serve the client regardless of their finish regarding the pregnancy.The ACA Code of Ethics does not address abortion specifically. There are areas of the code that speak to the issue in a general manner. The areas to be considered are a) does the decision to have an abortion have any relation to the clients own(prenominal) culture b) the counselors own values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors will take on to be guardedly guarded as to not be imposed on the client (p 4) and c) are the decisions the client is cladding within the faculty of the counselor to serve up guide the client.As in any clients case being reviewed by a counselor or counseling group all of these elements must be weighed out, as tumefy as some that whitethorn not have been discussed in this paper. The ACA Code of Ethics (2005) is written and qualified establish on an ever-changing world. The AACC Code of Ethics is based on stable Biblical standards. It stands to grounds that if an case-by-case adheres to the AACC Code of Ethics that a standard of accordance is more presumable to be seen, due to the unchanging nature of the Bible. A Christian counselor may find both publications to be very useful.In the same way a non-Christian will probably have absolutely no use for the AACC Code of Ethics (2004). No matter what an individuals faith-related dapple is, as a professional counselor, it is the highest anteriority to first do no harm ACA Code of Ethics (2005), and AACC Code of Ethics (2004). The very substructure of helping plurality through counseling requires that the counselor make a view treatment computer program to do no harm. With that understanding, it is the responsibility of the professional counselor to employment and exp lore whatever empirical resources are available to carry such a plan.References American Association of Christian Counselors Code of Ethics. (2004). American Association of Christian Counselors A. Retrieved howling(a) 23, 2012, from http//www. aacc. lucre/about-us/code-of-ethics/ American Counseling Association Code of Ethics. (2005). Ethics http//www. counseling. org/CP/CT2. aspx. Retrieved August 23, 2012, from http//www. counseling. org/Resources/CodeOfEthics/TP/Home/CT2. aspx novel Mandates and Imperatives in the rewrite ACA Code of Ethics. (2009). daybook of Counseling & Development, 87(2), 241-256.